Sažetak
Genocid nad Tutsima u Ruandi i genocid nad Bošnjacima u Bosni i Hercegovini počinjeni su gotovo istovremeno i u istom međunarod nom kontekstu, početkom 90-ih godina prošlog stoljeća. Dok je zločin genocida provođen na terenu, na međunarodnom nivou zvaničnici UN-a i vlade ve- likih sila be stijalno su negirale oba genocida. Nakon izvršenja genocida, oba zločina bivaju predmetom negiranja od strane pojedinaca, organiziranih grupa negatora, različitih organizacija, kao i zvaničnih institucija pojedinih država. Često genocide počinjene nad Tutsima i Bošnjacima negiraju isti negatori. Primarni interes negatora genocida nad Bošnjaci ma počinjenog u periodu 1992‒1995. godine jeste reducirati dokaze o genocidu počinjenom u Srebrenici i oko nje 1995. godine, dok je u slučaju genocida nad Tutsima taj interes fokusiran na okolnosti koje su prethodile genocidu i na ukupan broj žrtava. “Spontani zločin”, “retributivni zlo čin”, “dvostruki genocid”, “teorija zavjere” samo su neki od oblika negiranja genocida nad Tutsima i genocida nad Bošnjacima koji su elaborirani u ovom radu. Naposljetku, rad pokušava ukazati na najčešće korištene tehnike negiranja i zajedničke konceptualne karak teristike negiranja dva slučaja genocida. Prisustvo sistemskih i organi ziranih mjera u negiranju oba slučaja genocida dokazuje da je genocidna ideologija još uvijek aktivna i upozorava na mogućnost ponavljanja genocida.
Abstract
Genocides against the Tutsi in Rwanda and Bosniaks in Bosnia and Herzegovina were perpetrated almost at the same time and in the same international context in late 1990s. While genocides were being executed in the field, both were notoriously denied at the international level, both by UN bodies and officials of Big Powers. Aftermath genocide, the genocides have been denied on regular and systematic manner by individual denier, organized groups of deniers, certain organizations and governments of particular countries. Often, genocides committed against Tutsi and Bosniaks have been denied by same deniers. Prime interest of deniers of the genocide against Bosniaks, committed from 1992‒1995 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, has been to diminish evidence of Genocide in Srebrenica in 1995, while in case of genocide against Tutsi that interest has been focused on circumstances which preceded to genocide and death toll of Tutsi. “Spontaneous act”, “retributive crime”, “double genocide” and “conspiracy theory” are just some of denial’s form which are examined in this paper. Finally, the paper attempts to point out the most used techniques of denial and mutual conceptual features of denial of the two cases of genocide. Presence of systematic manner and wide spread of the denial, for both genocides, proves that genocides ideology is still alive and has warned about possibility for a reoccurrence of the genocide.